RAMESH CHANDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS.
WP(C)/4673/2017 · 2026-03-15
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1597 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1597 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010136552017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4673/2017 RAMESH CHANDRA KUMAR S/O- LATE TIKHOY KUMAR, R/O- GOTANAGAR, GHY-33 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS.
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPTT., OF REVENUE, GOVT OF ASSAM, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GHY- 6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUPR GOVT OF ASSAM AMINGAON GUWAHATI 3:SURANJANA SENAPATI FORMERLY THE CIRCLE OFFICER OF PALASHBARI CIRCLE GOVT OF ASSAM AND PRESENTLY BEING POSTED AS ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUPR AMINGAON GUWAHATI 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER PALASHBARI CIRCLE GOVT OF ASSAM DIST- KAMRUPR 5:SRIMOTI RENU BALA DAS
6:SITARAM DAS
7:MUKUT KUMAR DAS
Page No.# 2/2 ALL NO. 5 6 AND 7 ARE WIFE AND TWO SONS OF LATE KANU RAM DAS R/O- WARD NO.3 PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUPR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A C KALITA, MR.S KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 16.03.2026
None appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, appears for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 4. The petitioner is also found to have not taken steps for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 5, 6 and 7. On the last date of listing i.e. on 18.12.2025, it is found that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above position, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant