Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1580 (ORI)

ASHOK KUMAR PANDIT v. SECRETARY TO GOVT,SCHOOL AND MASS EDUCATION

WP(C)/11905/2017 · 2026-02-10

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 11905 of 2017 Ashok Kumar Pandit …. Petitioner Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Prem Kumar Mohanty, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 10.02.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 08. 1. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel refers to the instruction dated 29.06.2017 received in the office of the Advocate General pursuant to the directions issued by the Court. 2. He files a memo enclosing the said instruction. 3. It has to be noticed that the writ application was filed in the year 2017 with a prayer to allow the petitioner to fill up form for admission to B.H.Ed. course for the session 2017-2019. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. By interim order dated 20.06.2017, the Coordinate Bench had directed for accepting the form of the petitioner manually to be filed on 21.06.2017, thereafter, though the matter was listed before the National Lok Adalat on 13.07.2019 and before Coordinate Bench on 20.08.2025 and 11.11.2025, there is no submission on behalf of the petitioner that in fact he has filed the application manually as directed by the interim order dated 20.06.2017. 5. The learned counsel for petitioner files memo of date. The memo states thus : “MEMO That in the above noted case the prayer of the petitioner allowed by this Hon’ble Court. Accordingly the writ petition became infructuous.”(sic) The memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. The writ petition is disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the Director, T.E.&SCERT, Odisha, Bhubaneswar for information. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge dutta