Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1575 (GAU)

SMT. GEETALI CHOUDHURY v. THE SBI LIFE INS. CO. LTD. and 4 ORS.

WP(C)/1096/2017 · 2026-03-18

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010193362017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1096/2017 SMT. GEETALI CHOUDHURY PERMANENT RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 20, APURBA SINHA PATH, BYE LANE NO. 5, GUWAHATI - 781003, FORMERLY SERVING AS SENIOR AGENCY MANAGER BEARING EMPLOYEE ID15761, SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VERSUS THE SBI LIFE INS. CO. LTD. and 4 ORS. A SUBSIDIARY COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 OF THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, A BODY CORPORATE, ESTABLISHED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, BODY CORPORATE, ESTABLISHED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400069 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2:THE VICE PRESIDENT HR THE SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI-400069 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR NORTH EAST REGION SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2ND FLOOR ITAG PLAZA ABC POINT G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-781005 Page No.# 2/3 4:THE MANAGER HR SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2ND FLOOR ITAG PLAZA ABC POINT G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-781005 5:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA A BODY CORPORATE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA 1955 HAVING ITS LOCAL HEAD OFFICE AT DISPUR AMONGST OTHERS REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER LOCAL HEAD OFFICE NORTH EAST CIRCLE DISPUR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.P MAHANTA, MR.N DUTTA,MR.R B GOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S S SHARMAR- 1-4, P J DAS(R-1,2,3,4),MR S DAS(R- 1,2,3,4),MR.B J MUKHERJEE(R- 1-4),DR.B N GOGOI(R-5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 19.03.2026 Mr. A Goswami, learned counsel, on instructions of Mr. P Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has instructed not to press the matter any further and accordingly, prays that he be permitted to withdraw the same. 2. Prayer accepted. 3. Mr. P J Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 does not object to the prayer made by Mr. A Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant