Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1543 (ORI)

KALPANA NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/3494/2017 · 2026-03-17

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3494 of 2017 Kalpana Nayak …. Petitioner None -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. D.N. Lenka, AGA (for O.Ps. 1 and 2) CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 17.03.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 04. 1. The petition has been filed with the following prayer: “Issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ (s) directing the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to sanction and grant approval in favour of the petitioner so far post of Head Clerk in the Bhadrak Women’s College is concerned, within a stipulated period and/or alternatively direct the Opp. Party No.2 to take prompt decision on the representation of the petitioner as per Annexure-9.” 2. Though none appears for the petitioner, when the matter is called, memo dated 24.02.2026 is on record filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Kamala Kanta Nayak, which states thus: “The prayer of the petitioner has been sorted out in the meantime for which she is no more interested to proceed with the case and may be permitted to withdraw the case.” 3. In view of memo filed, the petition stands disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha