IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COMS No.07 of 2017 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ M/s Universal Appliances (India) …….Plaintiff Versus Vijay Home Appliance … Defendant _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Plaintiff: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-II, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, learned counsel representing the sole defendant, states that since defendant company i.e. corporate debtor has been dissolved, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant suit, rather appropriate remedy, if any, available to the plaintiff is to approach NCLT through claim petition. 2. In the aforesaid background, learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the present suit with liberty to approach appropriate authority in accordance with law. Ordered 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 accordingly. Needless to say, plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fee in accordance with law. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 11,2026 (shankar)