Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1522 (ORI)

BRUNDABAN MALIK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/16386/2017 · 2026-03-20

Manash Ranjan Pathak

Writ Petition (Civil)body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.16386 of 2017 Brundaban Malik and another …. Petitioners Represented By Adv.- None -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Represented By Adv.- Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, AGA (for opposite party Nos.1 to 3) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK Order No. ORDER 20.03.2026 (Hybrid mode) 02. 1. Heard Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate for the opposite party Nos.1 to 3. 2. None appears for the petitioners on call, though the names of four counsels have been reflected in the cause list. 3. The petitioners filed this writ petition on 09.08.2017 praying for a direction to the opposite parties, more particularly, opposite party Nos.2 and 3 to sanction/allot house in their favour under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana or Biju Pucca Ghara scheme. 4. Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the scheme under Biju Pucca Ghara is no longer in force in the State of Odisha and the scheme under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana has also been restructured. 5. Since filing this writ petition i.e. on 09.08.2017, the petitioners did not move this application. 6. For the reasons stated above, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Manash Ranjan Pathak), Judge Rabindra Designation: Personal Assistant