SATYA DEVI v. U.O.I.TH.MIN.OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS.
SWP/1695/2017 · 2026-08-18
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1431 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1431 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 56
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1695/2017
Satya Devi
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Union of India and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.08.2026
1. The record reveals that the instant matter has come up before this Court after more than nine years.
2. Today also, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even otherwise, the petition, with the efflux of time, has been rendered infructuous and this is the precise reason that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Jammu 18.08.2026 Mahavir