RUBINA AKHTER v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/55/2017 · 2026-07-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1410 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1410 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No.55/2017
Rubina Akhter .....Petitioner (s)
Through :- None.
v/s State of J&K and others .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy. AG for R-1 to 4. Mr. P. N. Bhat, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Urvashi Kitchloo, Advocate for R-5 & 6.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 21.07.2026
01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. 07.07.2026 and same is the position even today as well. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
02. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
JAMMU 21.07.2026 Shammi
Sr. No. 08