ANITA KUMARI v. RAVI SHANKER SHARMA, DIR.SCHOOL EDU.AND ANR.
CPSW/241/2017 · 2026-07-07
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 241/2017 in SWP No. 143/2011
Anita Kumari
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Karman Singh Johal, Advocate.
vs
Ravi Shanker Sharma, Dir. School Education and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.07.2026
1. The judgment dated 09.12.2016, non compliance of which has been reported to this Court, mandates the respondents to go ahead and complete the selection process pursuant to and in view of the aforementioned tentative list and issue engagement order of the petitioner.
2. Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and others vs. Saba Wani reported in 2026 INSC 439, has issued slew of directions so far as the appointment of RET Teachers is concerned.
3. In view of above, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed and the same is accordingly disposed of by directing the respondents to comply with the judgment, which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition, in light of the direction issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, within the time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.07.2026 Sahil Padha Serial No. 79 Sahil Padha 2026.07.08 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document