RUKSHANA BEGUM v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELF.DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1818/2017 · 2026-06-05
Sindhu Sharma
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1362 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1362 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1818/2017 c/w SWP No. 1819/2017 SWP No. 1869/2017
Rukshana Begum
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
State of J&K and others …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Mr. R.K.S. Thakur, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 05.06.2025
1. On the last date of hearing, i.e., on 24.04.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was taken up, no one appeared. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
2. Accordingly, all three petitions are dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 05.06.2025 Shafqat