TARSEM LAL AND ANR. v. ROHIT KANSAL COMM./SECY.P.W.D.
CPSW/44/2017 · 2026-05-04
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1331 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1331 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CJ Court
Case: CPSW No. 44/2017 IA No. 1/2017 IA No. 2/2017
Tarsem Lal and another ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Rohit Kansal .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Nirmal K. Kotwal, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 04.05.2026
Vide this petition, the petitioners pray for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent-Authorities for willful defiance of the interim order dated April 12, 2016, rendered by the Writ Court in SWP No.752/2016 (Tarsaim Lal Thapa & anr. Vs. State of J&K and ors.).
A bare reading of the order referred to above reveals that the Writ Court, while issuing notice to the respondents had required the Authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners under rules and having regard to the orders passed by the Supreme Court, appended with the petition. The records show that subsequently on October 28, 2021, the main case itself was transferred by this Court to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu. None is present either on behalf of the petitioners to point out if the lis between the parties still survives or the matter is still pending consideration before the Tribunal. That being so, the Court is choiceless, but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 04.05.2026 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Sr.No. 51 Pawan Chopra 2026.05.06 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document