FARID AHMAD TAK v. B.B.VYAS PR.SECY.ESTATES DEPTT.AND ORS.
CPSW/286/2017 · 2026-04-30
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1247 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1247 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: CPSW No. 286/2017 in SWP No. 2405/2015
Farid Ahmad Tak ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
B.B. Vyas and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 30.04.2026
Per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondents for want of registered covers.
None is present either on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition, which is pending for over a decade. That being so, the Court is choiceless but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 30.04.2026 Pawan Chopra/Secy.
Sr.No. 34 Pawan Chopra 2026.05.02 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document