SURAJ PARKASH v. FAROOQ SHAH SECY.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS
CPSW/369/2017 · 2026-04-30
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1236 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1236 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: CPSW No. 369/2017 in SWP No. 1076/2017 Suraj Parkash ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Farooq Shah, Secy. Education Deptt. & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 30.04.2026
Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent-Authorities for circumventing the directions issued by this Court vide order dated May 03, 2017, rendered in SWP No. 1076/2017 (Suraj Parkash V/s State of J&K).
A bare reading of the order referred to above shows that the petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the writ Court with a direction to the respondents to consider his representation with regard to the provisions of Transfer Policy, for, the petitioner had not been given any place of posting and kept idle for more than six months, whereas the Transfer Policy envisaged a special treatment to an official, who was approaching the age of superannuation and to give the petitioner a suitable place of posting within time indicated in the
order.
The petition is pending for over a decade and none is present either on behalf of the petitioner to clarify if anything actually survives in the matter. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having being rendered infructuous. However, in the event any dispute/cause of action/interest still survives, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application to seek restoration of the present petition and its decision on merits.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 30.04.2026 Suraj K. Singh
Sr.No. 68