OMKAR NATH RAINA AND ORS. v. STATE TH.RURAL DEVP.DEPTT.AND ORS.
OWP/1891/2017 · 2026-02-25
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No.1891/2017
Omkar Nath Raina and others
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Abhinav Jamwal, Advocate
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 25.02.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners fairly submits that, due to inadvertence, certain respondents who have no concern with the subject matter of the present petition have been arrayed as parties. He, therefore, prays that the present petition be permitted to be withdrawn, with a liberty to file fresh petition against the appropriate respondents, namely PMGSY, who have acquired the land of the petitioners.
2. In the aforesaid submission, the present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected application(s) with a liberty to file fresh petition.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
25.02.2026
Shammi
Sr. No. 05 SHAMMI KUMAR 2026.02.27 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document