RATTAN CHAND v. S.KR NAYAK,PR.SECY.AGRICULTURE AND ORS.
CPSW/565/2017 · 2026-02-25
Sanjay Dhar
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1117 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1117 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CPSW No.565/2017 in SWP No.632/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No.565/2017 in SWP No.632/2002
Date of pronouncement : 25.02.2026
Uploaded on : --.02.2026
Rattan Chand
….Petitioners
Through:- Mr. J A Hamal, Advocate
V/s
S.KR Nayak & Ors.
…..Respondents
Through:- Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
\
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
-
1. Compliance report is stated to have been filed by the respondents on 26.01.2026, however the same is not on record. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a hard copy of the same, which is taken on record.
2. It appears that pursuant to the judgment of the writ Court, the respondents have issued consideration
order bearing No.370-JK(RD&PR) of 2025 dated 30.12.2025 whereby after the re-engagement of the petitioner, his services have been regularized with Serial No.32 Regular List
CPSW No.565/2017 in SWP No.632/2002
effect from 09.04.2021, upon completion of 7 years in terms of SRO-64 of 1994.
3. In this view of the matter, the judgment of the writ Court stands complied with. The contempt proceedings are, therefore, closed.
4. The petition is disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE JAMMU
25.02.2026
Sneha
Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No