Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 01 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CRMC No. 461/2017 c/w CRMC No. 601/2017
Rahul Bansal
…. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Rajesh Kumar Abrol & Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Tehseena Bukhari, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Aseem Kumar Sawhney, Sr. Advocate in (CRMC No. 461/2017)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 01.04.2026
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive hearings. Today also, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioners are not inclined to pursue the matter further. Hence, both the petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
( SANJAY PARIHAR )
JUDGE
JAMMU 01.04.2026 Diksha