HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No.638/2017 in SWP No.2677/2016 Vipan Kumar and Another …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate Vs Princy Dhar Bhat and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER 28.01.2026 01. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks an adjournment to enable the petitioner to file fresh application for substitution of contemnors. 02. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the claim of the petitioners for their regularization has already been considered by the respondent and the same has been rejected in terms of Government order No.368 PW 2019 dated 24.09.2019. She has provided copy of the order to the learned counsel for the petitioners in open Court. 03. The direction of the writ Court was to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners. Since the respondents have considered the case of the petitioners and passed the consideration order as such, the order of the writ Court stands complied with. 04. The contempt proceedings are therefore closed leaving it open to the petitioners to challenge the consideration order by taking resort to appropriate remedy. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge Jammu 28.01.2026 Mahavir Sr. No. 38