APHC010187372017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 2755 of 2017 Between: 1. PEDARIKAM NIRMULANA PARTY (P.N.P.), REGD No. 56/42/ 2010/ PPS-1, OFFICE D.No. 66 COAST CHURCH, KAKINADA REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, DR. KONDEPUDI SUBBA RAO 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 4. THE TAHSILDAR, K. GANGAVARAM MAN DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KAJULU DISTRICT 6. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAPU DISTRICT 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 2755 of 2017 NIRMULANA PARTY (P.N.P.), REGD No. 56/42/ 2010/ 1, OFFICE D.No. 66-1-3/A, S. ATCHUTAPURAM, OPP. PENTHU COAST CHURCH, KAKINADA-533 004, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, DR. KONDEPUDI SUBBA RAO ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT THE TAHSILDAR, K. GANGAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI THE TAHSILDAR, KAJULURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA NIRMULANA PARTY (P.N.P.), REGD No. 56/42/ 2010/ 3/A, S. ATCHUTAPURAM, OPP. PENTHU 533 004, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT DAL, EAST GODAVARI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI I MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.C V BHANOJI RAMARS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Dt.17.07.2026 BLV 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA W.P.No.2755 of 2017 Dt: 17.07.2026