APHC010580152017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 17916 of 2017 Between: 1. VANKAYALA GOPAL RAO, S/O.PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE AUTHORITY JOINT GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MACHAVARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.JANIMIYA, AGED MAJOR, R/O.SANATHNAGAR, SRT 1178, HYDERABAD. 6. SHAIK BIBIJAN, W/O.MOHAMMED ALI, AGED MAJOR, R/O.SANATHNAGAR, SRT 1178, HYDERABAD. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 17916 of 2017 VANKAYALA GOPAL RAO, S/O.PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR THE REVENUE AUTHORITY JOINT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA, GUNTUR THE TAHSILDAR, MACHAVARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SHAIK MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.JANIMIYA, AGED MAJOR, R/O.SANATHNAGAR, SRT 1178, HYDERABAD. SHAIK BIBIJAN, W/O.MOHAMMED ALI, AGED MAJOR, R/O.SANATHNAGAR, SRT 1178, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA VANKAYALA GOPAL RAO, S/O.PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA, GUNTUR SHAIK MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.JANIMIYA, AGED MAJOR, SHAIK BIBIJAN, W/O.MOHAMMED ALI, AGED MAJOR, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.SREENIVAS PADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. Mr.D KRISHNA MURTHY 3. Mr.VEDULA SRINIVAS The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.17.07.2026 BLV THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.17916 of 2017 Dt: 17.07.2026