NASIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. TASADUQ JEELANI,SECY.R.D.D.AND ANR.
CPSW/19/2016 · 2026-08-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 946 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 946 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 19/2016 in SWP No. 1981/2015
Nasir Hussain Shah ….Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
V/s
Tasaduq Jeelani, Secy. R. D. D. and another ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy AG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.08.2026
01. Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two consecutive dates of hearings and same is the position today as well. Thus, inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant contempt petition, presumably because the grievance stands redressed.
02. Accordingly, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 07.08.2026 Vijay
Sr. No. 200 Vijay Kumar 2026.08.10 17.24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu