SEEMA KHARYAL v. G.HUSSAIN SECY.LABOUR DEPTT.AND ORS..
CPSW/439/2016 · 2026-08-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 937 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 937 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 439/2016 in SWP No. 1951/2016
Seema Kharyal ….Petitioner(s)
Through :- NONE.
V/s
G. Hussain Hussain & Anr ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy AG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.08.2026
01. Mr. Vishal Bharti, learned Dy AG appearing on behalf of the respondents fairly submits that the instant contempt petition arises out of an interim
order passed by this Court dated 17.09.2016 in SWP No. 1951/2016. He further submits that the aforesaid order has been duly complied with and that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been considered and rejected. Therefore, a prayer has been made that proceedings in the contempt petition be closed.
02. Since, the order passed by this Court mentioned supra stands complied with, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the instant contempt petition alive.
03. Accordingly, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, stand discharged. Contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 07.08.2026 Vijay
Sr. No. 205 Vijay Kumar 2026.08.10 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu