SEHRISH AND ORS. v. S.H.O.P/S.BARI BRAHMANA AND ANR.
CRMC/41/2016 · 2026-07-20
Ma Chowdhary
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 925 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 925 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 41/2016
Sehrish & Ors.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
S.H.O. P/S Bari Brahmana & Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vivek Mattoo, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG for R-1. Ms. Shagun Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (20.07.2026)
01.
Objections are stated to have been filed by both the respondents.
02. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So was the case on the last date of hearing, which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
03. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith connected application(s).
04. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
20.07.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 34 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.07.20 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document