SARITA KUMARI v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1624/2016 · 2026-07-07
Rajnesh Oswal
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 905 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 905 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1624/2016 IA No. 1/2016
Sarita Kumari
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate.
vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition, along with the connected application, is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.07.2026 Sahil Padha
Serial No. 60 Sahil Padha 2026.07.08 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document