SUMIT CHANDIAL AND ORS. v. HILAL A PARRAY,PR.SECY.TECH.EDU.AND ORS.
CPSW/206/2016 · 2026-07-07
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 901 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 901 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 206/2016 in SWP No. 451/2016 IA No. 1/2016
Sumit Chandail and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
Hilal A Parray, Pr. Secy. Tech. Education and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.07.2026
1. No one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners ever since
21.12.2016.
2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, whereby claims of the petitioners have been rejected in terms of order dated 04.07.2016.
3. Accordingly, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to assail the order dated 04.07.2016, if so advised.
4.
Disposed of along with the connected application.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.07.2026 Sahil Padha
Serial No. 49 Sahil Padha 2026.07.08 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document