SHAMSHER SINGH v. G.MOHAN KUMAR,SECY.DEFENCE AND ORS.
CPSW/398/2016 · 2026-04-24
Review Petitionbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 814 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 814 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CJ Court Case: CPSW No. 398/2016 in SWP No. 1043/1998 Shamsher Singh ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None Vs
G. Mohan Kumar, Secy. Defence & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 24.04.2026
Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent-Authorities for willful disobedience of the
order and judgment dated August 05, 2002, rendered in SWP No. 1043/1998. The said judgment was upheld by the Division Bench on November 27, 2013 in LPASW No. 440 of 2002. Subsequently, the application for condonation of delay in filing the review petition for review of order dated November 27, 2013 passed in said appeal, also came to be dismissed vide order dated December 21,
2015.
A bare reading of the order dated August 05, 2002 reveals that the petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the learned Single Bench with the observation that the petitioner would be entitled to re-instatement with all consequential benefits. It was further observed that since the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation, such consequential benefits would be extended and duly reflected in his pension also.
The matter is pending for over a decade. None is present either on behalf of the petitioner to clarify if anything actually survives in the petition. That being so, the Court is choiceless, but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 24.04.2026 Pawan Chopra/Secy.
Sr.No. 51 Pawan Chopra 2026.04.27 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document