Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010671742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 6/2016 Between: Perni Raghavaiah Yarlagadd Ramulu and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA 2. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 7/2016 Between: Perni Raghavaiah Prathipati Rangamma and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA 2. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU The Court made the following: ------ 20.07.2026 24.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 6/2016 ...APPELLANT AND Yarlagadd Ramulu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): MARRI VENKATA RAMANA SRICHARAN TELAPROLU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 7/2016 ...APPELLANT AND Prathipati Rangamma and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): MARRI VENKATA RAMANA SRICHARAN TELAPROLU The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3573] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NOs: 6 and 7 of 2016 COMMON JUDGMENT: 1. These C.M.S.A.Nos.6 and 7 of 2026, filed under Section 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, are preferred by the appellant-respondent against the judgments dated 28.01.2016 passed in A.S.Nos.57 and 59 of 2014, respectively, by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant in both the appeals died during the pendency of the proceedings. He further submits that, though efforts were made to inform the relatives of the deceased appellant regarding the pendency of the appeals and the necessity to take appropriate steps, they have not come forward to file necessary applications for bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. 3. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that, in the absence of any steps being taken by the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant to come on record and prosecute the appeals, the appeals stand abated. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals are dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 20.07.2026 SAK Whether the Judgments are: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes 175 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NOs: 6 and 7 of 2016 Date: 20.07.2026 SAK