Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2016 DAILYLAW 782 (AP)

Vandadi Venkateswarulu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary

WP/5785/2016 · 2026-06-18

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010509722016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.5785 of 2016 Between: 1. VANDADI VENKATESWARULU,, S/O LATE GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.53/199/16, LAKSHMIPURAM, GALIVEEDU ROAD, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R DISTRICT 2. Y.BRAHMANANDA REDDY,, W/O.Y.NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: TRUST BOARD MEMBER, R/O.DOOR NO.51/142-5-74, N.G.O.COLONY, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 3. B.BHASKAR,, S/O.B.RACHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: TRUST BOARD MEMBER, R/O.DOOR NO.69/28, TYAGARAJA STREET, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 4. VAKA MALLIKARJUN,, S/O.V.ADENNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: TRUST BOARD MEMBER, R/O.DOOR NO.49/99, KOTHAPET, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 5. N.G.V.RAMANA,, S/O.N.G.CHENNAKESAVULU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC: TRUST BOARD MEMBER, R/O.DOOR NO.69-101, OLD POST OFFICE STREET, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 6. A.NARAYANA,, S/O.A.KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: TRUST BOARD MEMBER, DOOR NO.53/171, GAALIVEEDU ROAD, KOTHAPET, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R. DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS-II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, ABIDS, HYDERABAD. 2 3. SRI VEERA BHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE, RAYACHOTY, Y.S.R.DISTRICT REP., BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Letter No.136997(Endts.II(1)/2015, dated 18-02-2016 issued by the respondent No.1 rejecting petitioners request for restoration of the period of the Trust Board which is deprived off in pursuance of the Act No.8 of 2014 which was later on struck down by this Hon'ble Court vide order, dated 30-12-2014 made in Writ Petition No.29I 89 of 2014 and batch as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioners under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to restore the period of the Trust Board of the respondent No.3 appointed through the G.O.Rt.No.105, Revenue (Endowments-II) Department, dated 01-02-2014 and to continue it till for a period of 325 days i.e., till 25-12-2016. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.5785 of 2016 ORDER:- Sri Shaik Ameenuddin, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioners, and stated that the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.06.2026 siva 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No.5785 of 2016 19.06.2026 ssiivvaa