APHC010358792016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19006/2016 Between: 1. PEERAM SUBBAYAMMA, W/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC : CULTIVATION, R/O.NARAKODUR VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. CHERUKURI SIVAMMA,, W/O.LATE MURAHARI RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC : CULTIVATION, R/O.NARAKODUR VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, DHARMIKA BHAVAN, TILAK ROAD, RAMKOTI, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI GANAPA LINGESWARA SWAMY AND SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY, DEVASTANAM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NARAKODUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. M SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.NARAKODURU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more so, a writ in the nature of mandamus, by declaring the impugned orders of the 3rd respondent to conducting the auction for the lands in Sy.No.200 admg. Ac.5.25 cents at Narakoduru Village, Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District on 02.06.2016 as arbitrary, illegal, unlawful and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent not to dispossess the petitioners from cultivation of the said lands without following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 23317 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from cultivation of the lands in Sy.No.200, 2 admg. Ac.5.25 cents at Narakoduru Village, Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District during the pendency of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 23318 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to confirm the auction of lease hold rights in favour of the 4th respondent in pursuance of the auction conducted by the 3rd respondent on 02.06.2016 for the lands in Sy.No.200 admg. Ac.5.25 cents at Narakoduru Village, Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District during the pendency of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.19006 of 2016 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, it indicates that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.06.2026 KBN 4 14 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 19006 of 2016 Date: 19.06.2026 KBN