Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2016 DAILYLAW 778 (AP)

Sree Vijayawada Gosamrakshana Sangam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32243/2016 · 2026-06-17

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010585592016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 32243/2016 Between: 1. SREE VIJAYAWADA GOSAMRAKSHANA SANGAM, REGD NO 8 OF 1929, ARJUN STREET, MALLIKARJUNAPET VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP BY ITS SECRETARY KAMAL NAYAN BANG, S/O. RAM KUMAR BANG, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY A.P. SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH BOGGULAGUNTA, ABIDS, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI , MACHILIPATNAM. 4. SREE DURGAMALLESWARA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, INDRAKILADRI, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to evict the petitioners Sangam from the land of an extent of 21.12 '/2 cents in NTS No.1098/2 in Arjun Street, Maltikarjuna Pet, Vijayawada without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and right guaranteed under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of the petitioner's Gosala without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 39876 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner from the land of an extent of 21.12 '/2 cents in NTS 2 No.1098/2 in Arjun Street, Mallikarjuna Pet, Vijayawada pending disposal of the above Writ Petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.32243 of 2016 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represented and stated that cause in the writ petition does not survive and that the matter has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.06.2026 KBN 4 10 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 32243 of 2016 Date: 18.06.2026 KBN