HN, J W.P.No.20416_2016 APHC010192192016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20416/2016 Between: 1. PASUPULATI PADMAVATHI,, S/O VENKATA RAMANA, AGE: 44YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, RIO H.NO.19-7-29, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION) SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ONGOLE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY, ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE CITY. PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in respect of the property of the petitioner bearing H.No 19-7-29, in survey No.14/1, Ongole HN, J W.P.No.20416_2016 City and Mandal, Prakasham District as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to demolish the property of the petitioner bearing H.No 19-7-29, in survey No:14/1, Ongole City an,1Mandal, Prakasham District in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 25037 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to 5 not to demolish the property of the petitioner bearing H.No.19-7-29, in survey No.14/1, Ongole City and Mandal, Prakasham District till pending disposal of writ petition in the interest of justice and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) HN, J W.P.No.20416_2016 ORDER: 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner(s). 2. Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent Municipality, submits that the petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the action of respondents in respect of the property of the petitioner, and a direction not to demolish the same is sought for. It is submitted that this Court, vide order dated 24.06.2016, granted interim direction as prayed for; however, made it clear that the respondents could proceed in accordance with law. 3. Recording the submission, the present writ petition is disposed off in terms of the interim order granted earlier. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.06.2026 NKA HN, J W.P.No.20416_2016 57 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20416 of 2016 Date: 16.06.2026 NKA