S SRINIVAS @ CHINNI, VISAKHAPATNAM v. S.LEELAVATHI, VISAKHAPATNAM & 3 OTHERS
CRP/5027/2016 · 2026-06-03
Subba Reddy Satti
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 771 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 771 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010250532016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5027/2016 Between:
1. S SRINIVAS @ CHINNI, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O. SRI. S.NOOKA RAJU, AGED 34 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.24-16-2/1, BEHIND 'MORE' SUPER MARKET, CHINA GANTYADA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 026. ...PETITIONER AND
1. S LEELAVATHI VISAKHAPATNAM 3 OTHERS, W/O. S. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, PRESENTLY R/AT. HER PARENTS' HOUSE BEARING FLAT NO.102, SREE HILLS, MADHAVADHARA VUDA COLONY, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 018. 2. BABY SIRSAPALLI SLAGHYA PRAAASANA, D/O. SRI SRINIVAS, AGED 2 1/2 YEARS, REST -DITTO- RESPONDENT BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER RAOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, THE 1ST RESPONDENT)
3. SMT SIRSAPALLI VARALAKSHMI, W/O. S.NOOKA RAJU, AGED 55 YEARS, RUNNING MEDICAL SHOP IN THE NAME AND STYLE OF
"SAL MEDICALS" AT KANITHI ROAD, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM AND R/O. D.NO.24-16-2/1, BEHIND 'MORE' SUPER MARKET, CHINA GANTYADA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 026. 4. SRI SIRSAPALLI NOOKA RAJU, S/O. LATE SRI S.APPALA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, REST -DITTO-. (RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS CRP)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the Order dated 10.04.2016 in I.A.No.521 of 2015 on FCOP.No. 1021 of 2015 of the Court of Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 6519 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 10.04.2016 passed in 1.A.No.521 of 2015 in F.C.O.P. No. 1021 of 2015 of the Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the C.R.P., and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'nle Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2016(CRPMP 7453 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the order dated 21.10.2016 passed in CRPMP No.6519/2016 in CRP No.5027/2016 and dismiss the above CRP in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NH AKBAR The Court made the following: ORDER
Sri P.Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the civil revision petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD