Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010311862016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3126/2016 Between:
1. PAMATHI KARUNAKAR, KRISHNA DT.,, S/O EESWARA RAO, OCC: COOLI,
R/O KRISHNAPURAM, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. PAMARTHI SIRISHA KRISHNA DT 2 OTRS REP PP, W/O KARUNAKAR, OCC: TAILARING WORK, R/O D.NO.12-393, GURAJADADONKA ROAD, BACKSIDE OF K.C.P. SUGAR FACTORY, VUYYURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISRICT. 2. PAMARTHI NIREEKSHANA, D/O KARUNAKAR, AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, BEING MINOR REP.BY HER MOTHER P.SIRISHA R/O D.NO.12-393, GURAJADADONKA ROAD, BACKSIDE OF K.C.P.
SUGAR FACTORY, VUYYURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order and decree in M.C.No.206 of 2013 on the file of XIV Additional District &
2
Sessions Judge cum Additional Family Judge: Vijayawada dated 03-02-2016 and pass such oter orders in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4791 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 172 days in representing Crl. R.C. and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4884 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of the order and decree in MC.No.2063/2013, dated 03.02.2016 on the file of the XIV additional District & Sessions Judge cum Additional Family Judge, Vijayawada before this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3126/2016 The Court made the following:
The instant Criminal Revision case has been preferred against the order passed by the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. Mr. P.Karteek, learned counsel representing Mr.
P.N.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled outside the Court, he intends to with draw the case. Taking note of submission of Mr. P.Karteek, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as withdrawn. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:27.04.2026 SSA