UOI.TH.DY.CHEIF ENGINEER AND ANR. v. BACHAN SINGH AND ORS.
CONC/106/2016 · 2026-03-06
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 736 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 736 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 49
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONC No. 106/2016
Union of India and Anr.
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Srijan Mahajan, Advocate
V/s
Bachan Singh and Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
06.03.2026
CONC No. 106/2016
1. The record reveals that the last and final opportunity was granted to the learned counsel for the respondents for filing reply, but till date reply has not been filed. Even none has appeared on behalf of the respondents and an inference can be drawn that no serious objection for allowing the condonation of delay application has been raised by the respondents.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. For the reasons stated in the application and, in light of the no serious objection from the other side, the same is allowed and the delay 180 days for filing the appeal is condoned.
4. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of.
5. Registry is directed to list the main appeal
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu: 06.03.2026 Javid Iqbal