HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 379/2016 in SWP No. 1350/2014 c/w CPSW No. 382/2016 CPSW No. 390/2016 Shashi Prabha …..Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Deeksha Handoo, Advocate. Vs B. R. Sharma, C. Secy. & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER 18.02.2026 CPSW Nos. 382/2016 & 390/2016 01. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in both these cases, the respondents have complied with the judgment passed by the writ court. Her statement is taken on record. 02. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings do not survive and the same are, accordingly, closed. Both contempt petitions are disposed of. 03. Both these petitions are delinked and consigned to record. CPSW No. 379/2016 04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while forwarding the case of the petitioner to the Accountant General, respondents No. 1 to 3 have not made correct calculations. Regular Cause List Sr. No. 31 2 CPSW No. 379/2016 in SWP No. 1350/2014 c/w CPSW No. 382/2016 CPSW No. 390/2016 05. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file response to the compliance report filed by the respondents indicating therein as to what are the discrepancies which according to the petitioner have been committed by the respondents while forwarding her case to the Office of the Accountant General. Needful be done by or before the next date of hearing. 06. Be listed on 25.03.2026. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE Jammu 18.02.2026 Shivalee Shivalee Khajuria 2026.02.19 17.17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu