SACHIN SAFAYA AND ANR. v. STATE TH.S.S.P.JAMMU AND ORS.
CRMC/624/2016 · 2026-02-20
Rajnesh Oswal
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 624/2016 IA No. 1/2016 CrlM No. 1895/2021
Sachin Safaya and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate.
vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 20.02.2026
1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that although the petitioner Sachin Safaya and the respondent No. 3-Aronima have settled the dispute amicably, pursuant to which marriage between them was also dissolved by decree of divorce dated 12.02.2018, but the respondent No. 2, for unknown reasons, is not causing appearance before the Court, as such, in the present facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner would not like to press the present petition. However, he submits that the learned trial court be requested to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. Ordered accordingly and the learned trial court shall ensure that no unnecessary adjournments are granted to prosecution as well as to defence.
4. Record, if received in original, be remitted to the trial court.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 20.02.2026 Sahil Padha Serial No. 120 Sahil Padha 2026.02.20 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document