NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MAC No. 5 of 2016  The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Through Divisional Manager, Division Office Shivnath Complex, G. E. Road, Bhilai, Zila Durg Chhattisgarh........Insurer Of Vehicle Motor Cycle No. Pulsor No. C G 07 L Z 7612, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant/respondent No.2 Versus 1. B. Nagratnam W/o B. Ishwar Rao, Aged About 37 Years R/o Quarter No. 2/a, Road No. 18, Sector 07, Bhilai Police Station Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh........Claimant No. 1, Chhattisgarh 2. B. Ishwar Rao S/o B. Yarnanna, Aged About 45 Years R/o Quarter No. 2/a, Road No. 18, Sector 07, Bhilai Police Station Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh..........Claimant No. 2, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. B. Sandeep S/o B. Ishwar Rao, Aged About 18 Years R/o Quarter No. 2/a, Road No. 18, Sector 07, Bhilai Police Station Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh...........Claimant No. 03, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. B. Revi S/o B. Madhusudan Rao, Aged About 22 Years R/o Quarter No. 02/b, Road No. 30, Sector No. 07, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh......Driver Of Motor Cycle Pulsor No. C G 07 L Z 7612 , District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Pushpendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Dhaneshram Sahu, Aged About 20 Years R/o Janta Colony Chouk, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Zila Raipur Chhattisgarh.........Driver Of Motorcycle Hero Honda Passion No. C G 07 L L 1037.......Non Appellant No. 3, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6. Jagdish Singh S/o Shri Harivansh Singh, R/o Muktidham Road, Near Son Chakki, Ramnagar, Supela, Bhilai Tahsil And Zila Durg Chhattisgarh.........Owner Of Motorcycle Hero Honda Passion No. C G 07 L L 1037..........Non Appellant No. 4, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.06.30 12:34:10 +0530 25.06.2025 The matter is listed in final disposal and was being called repeatedly. However, no one appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even today and even on 07.05.2025. 2. Since no one appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Anjani