Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Anshul Gupta
MAC/426/2016 · 2026-05-11
Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 620 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 620 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 426 of 2016 Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited , Through Branch Office, M.G. Road, Ambedkar Chowk, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh .............Non-Applicant No.3, ... Appellant versus 1 - Anshul Gupta S/o Sushil Gupta, Aged About 17 Years Caste- Vaishya, Occupation- Student, Through Legal Guardian Sushil Gupta Son Of R.A. Gupta, Aged About 46 Years, Caste- Vaishya, R/o Nawapara Ward No. 06, Police Station And
Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ..............Claimant, 2 - Dr. Rajendra Yadav S/o B.N. Yadav, Aged About 36 Years Caste- Ahir, R/o Sattipara, Dr. Rajendra Physiotherapy Clinic, Tahsil and P.S.- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ayush Dashrath Sahu S/o Vishwanath Sahu, Aged About 30 Years Caste- Halbi, R/o Sattipara, Dr. Rajendra Physiotherapy Clinic, Tahsil And P.S.- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ...............Non-Applicants,
... Respondents For the appellant : None For Respondent(s) : None (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
2 Order on Board 12.05.2026 This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company against the award dated 06.01.2016 passed by the learned IV Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur, District Sarguja. On earlier two occasions when the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.04.2026 and 29.04.2026, no one has appeared to argue the case on behalf of the appellant. Even today when the matter is called out in second round, no one appears for the appellant. Since no representation is made on behalf of the appellant despite the matter is repeatedly taken up and called out for hearing, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao