1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No.240 of 2016 1 - Smt. Sushila Bai Sanwra W/o Late Jalan Sanwra, Aged About 42 Years 2 - Suraj Kumar Sanwra S/o Late Jalan Sanwra, Aged About 19 Years, 3 - Minor Subham Sanwra S/o Late Jalan Sanwra, Aged About 16 Years, [Appellant No.3 being minor through his Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Sushila Bai Sanwra, Appellant No. 01] All R/o Ward No. 04, Bajrang Chowk, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil and Post Office Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.......Claimants, ... Appellants versus 1 - Pritkumar Nishad S/o Sundar Ram Nishad, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Budera, Post Office And Police Station Kharora, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.........Driver of Vehicle Truck Bearing Regtistration No. CG-05- B-1780, 2 - Abdul Razzak Meman, S/o Haji Noor Mohammad, R/o Noor Mohammad Medical Store, Main Road, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh........Registered Owner of Truck Bearing Registration No. CG- 05-B-1780 3 - The United India Insurance Limited Company, Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Kutchery Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur, Post Office Raipur, Police Station Gol Bazar, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh.........Insurer of Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration No. CG-05- B-1780, 4 - Roop Lal Sinha S/o Jayanti Lal Sinha, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Majarkatta, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh......Driver of Vehicle Motor Cycle Bearing Registration No. CG-06-C-8107, 5 - Sunil Ramteke S/o Late Ishwar Ramteke, Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 05, Naya Para, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And Post AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.01.29 17:00:59 +0530 2 Office Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh......Registered Owner of Motor Cycle Bearing Registration No. CG-06-C-8107........Non Applicants, ... Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Raj Kumar Pali, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Pravesh Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 29/01/2026 1. When the matter is called repeatedly, no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants, even on the previous date of hearing i.e. 15.01.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Avinash