Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 802 of 2016 Lalit Kumar Soni S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Soni, Aged About 22 Years R/o Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil and Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ...........Claimant,
--- Appellant versus 1 - Afroz Sheikh S/o Annudin Sheikh, Aged About 35 Years R/o Gauri Nagar Rajnandgaon, Tehsil and District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ...............Driver, 2 - Indian Agro and Food Industries Ltd. Indamara Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ..............Owner, 3 - Manager, The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Parakh Bhawan, Station Road Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh ...............Insurance Company,
--- Respondents MAC No. 803 of 2016 Lokesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Soni, Aged About 22 Years R/o Ramadhin
Marg,
Rajnandgaon,
Tehsil
And
District Rajnandgaon........Claimant ,
---Appellant Versus 1 - Afroz Sheikh S/o Annudin Sheikh, Aged About 35 Years R/o Gauri Nagar Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh......Driver, 2 - Indian Agro And Food Industries Ltd. Indamara Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh........Owner, 3 - Manager, The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Parakh Bhawan, Station Road Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh......Insurance Company, PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2026.04.17 15:26:52 +0530
2
--- Respondents
For Appellants : None For Respondent No.3 in both Appeals : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate along with Ms. Manshi Bandey, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 17/04/2026
1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants today after repeated calls for hearing the matters, even when the matters were called for hearing on dated 15.04.2026 and 16.04.2026, no one appeared for the Appellants.
2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeals for non- prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
Judge Prakash