The United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shahjad Ali
MAC/103/2016 · 2026-03-31
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 553 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 553 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 103 of 2016 The United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office- Tara Complex, Power House, G.E. Road, Bhilai, Zila- Durg, Chhattisgarh, Insurer Of Vehicle- Zeep Bearing Registration No. C.G. 07/4409 ..........Respondent No. 2.
... Appellant versus 1 - Shahjad Ali S/o B. Israfil Khan, Aged About 25 Years R/o Aditya Nagar Durg, Chhattisgarh Claimant No. 1, 2 - Jay Kumar Yadav Ray S/o Chhatti Lal Yadav, Aged About 30 Years R/o Sector-7, Road No.-20, Quarter No. 4-A, Thana- Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, Driver Of Vehicle- Zeep Bearing Registration No. C.G. 07/4409 ...........Non Appellant No. 1, 3 - Sumitra Bai Resident Of Camp-1, Road-18, Bhilai, Zilla- Durg, Chhattisgarh, Owner Of Vehicle- Zeep Bearing Registration No. C.G.07/4409 ..........Non-Appellant No.2, ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondents : None
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 01/04/2026
1. The matter was called on 12.06.2025 and 11.07.2025, but on both occasions, no representation was made on behalf of the appellant, therefore, the matter was adjourned and even today when the matter is called repeatedly, none is present for the appellant nor any representation is made Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2026.04.01 15:50:25 +0530
2 on its behalf.
2. In the above circumstance and in the absence of any representation, no other option is left out to this Court but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani