PUSHPA GAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU. UP GOVT. and ANOTHER
WRIA/22719/2016 · 2026-07-22
Pankaj Bhatia
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4199 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4199 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 22719 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sapana Verma, Mohammad Shahan, Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, Vikram Jeet Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chauhan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pushpa Gaur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Up Govt. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench