VIKASH GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ CIVIL SECTTandORS.
WRIA/22468/2016 · 2026-07-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 22468 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Pandey, Niteesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajeev Narayan Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vikash Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Panchayati Raj Civil Secttandors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench