Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 4197 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ LUCKNOW and ORS.

WRIA/22472/2016 · 2026-07-21

Pankaj Bhatia

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 22472 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Pandey, Niteesh Kumar, Vineet Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajeev Narayan Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vijay Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Panchayati Raj Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench