LAL BAHADUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.CANE DEVELOPMENT and SUGAR and ORS.
WRIA/19772/2016 · 2026-07-20
Pankaj Bhatia
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 4195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 19772 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uma Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., K.S. Pawar, Paramanand Asthana (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Lal Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Cane Development And Sugar And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench