HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 19304 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Pandey, Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vindhyawashini Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thr Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Govt.Of Upandors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench