IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 226 RSA-312-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Karamveer Singh . . . . Appellant Vs. Vijay Singh and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the appellant. Mr.G.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the respondents. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the position on behalf of the appellant on two different dates when the matter was listed for actual hearing. Even the intimation was sent to Mr.Divanshu Jain, Advocate, for the appellant as per the report of Registry. Still there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 03.09.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.09.03 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document