IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 222 FAO-3037-2016 Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Smt. Rampati . . . . Appellant Vs. Laxman Singh Thekedar and others . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. Vide order dated 04.07.2017, notice of motion was issued. Thereafter, matter has not been listed for actual hearing as the turn of the case did not come. It is further reported by the Registry that notice could not be issued as necessary process fee was not filed on behalf of the appellant. 3. In these circumstances, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution as well as for want of process fee. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 03.09.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.09.03 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document