Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2016 DAILYLAW 4041 (PNJ)

JAGJEET SINGH @ LADDI @ JATINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/41202/2026 · 2026-08-13

Alok Jain

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (128) JAGJEET SINGH @ LADDI @ JATINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. expedite and conclude the trial in FIR No. 258 dated 11.11.2016, registered under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Kotwali, District Bathinda, Punjab. 2. has already been concluded and the petitioner has been convicted. Accordingly, the prayer made in the present petition does not survive. 3. petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. August 13, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JAGJEET SINGH @ LADDI @ JATINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Karandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been expedite and conclude the trial in FIR No. 258 dated 11.11.2016, registered under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Kotwali, District Bathinda, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that has already been concluded and the petitioner has been convicted. Accordingly, the prayer made in the present petition does not survive. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. August 13, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41202-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 13.08.2026 JAGJEET SINGH @ LADDI @ JATINDER SINGH ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Mr. Karandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to expedite and conclude the trial in FIR No. 258 dated 11.11.2016, registered under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Kotwali, District Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the trial has already been concluded and the petitioner has been convicted. Accordingly, the prayer made in the present petition does not survive. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 13.08.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent filed seeking a direction to expedite and conclude the trial in FIR No. 258 dated 11.11.2016, registered under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Kotwali, District the trial has already been concluded and the petitioner has been convicted. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the having been rendered MANJU 2026.08.17 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document