Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2016 DAILYLAW 4020 (PNJ)

RANDHIR SINGH v. SPECIAL SECRETARY COOPERATION DEPARTMENT PUNJAB CHD AND ORS

CWP/20904/2016 · 2026-07-27

Namit Kumar

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 CWP-20904-2016 Date of decision: 27.07.2026 Randhir Singh .....Petitioner Versus The Special Secretary (Cooperation), Cooperation Department, Punjab and Chandigarh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Mr. J.C. Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, for quashing the orders dated 30.05.2011 (Annexure P-6), dated 06.11.2012 (Annexure P-7) and dated 12.11.2014 (Annexure P-8) as well as order dated 29.03.2016 (Annexure P-9), which are contrary to the records of the society and statutory provisions of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act and Rules. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has unfortunately died and he is not in touch with his LRs. 3. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. VINAY 2026.07.27 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-20904-2016 -2- 4. However, liberty is granted to the LRs of the petitioner to revive the present petition in case they are so interested and any cause still survives. 27.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2026.07.27 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment