Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 FAO-3586-2016
DATE OF DECISION: 17.07.2026 VIKAS …Appellant Versus SANJIV ROHILLA AND OTHERS
... Respondent CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate, Mr. Prabhsher Singh Walia, Advocate and Mr. Nikhil, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** DEEPAK GUPTA
, J. (ORAL)
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the position on 08.07.2025 when the matter was taken up for actual hearing. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE
1707.2026
sapna adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether reportable : Yes No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.07.17 17.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document